Jude’s Quote From the Book of Enoch – Many Jews and apologists of the Bible have questioned Jude’s quote as a sign of the apocryphal book’s influence on the faith.
Jude’s Quote From the Book of Enoch
This article will explore some of the questions surrounding Jude’s quote, as well as the book’s contradictions and its relationship to Judaism. It will also examine the book’s inspiration. It is an apocryphal book, and is not a legitimate source for Bible study.
A common question about the Book of Enoch is whether it contains true words, and a Christian should clarify its source. While the Book of Enoch was never considered inspired, Christians have long held that it was.
You may want to learn: “The Truth About Silver Spoons: Do They Actually Work?”
The early Christian Church even did not include the Book of Enoch in its Bible. Jude’s quotation from the Book of Enoch demonstrates that Jude referred to a prophet who had a message for us.
The Bible contains a genealogy from Adam to Noah, a genealogy that includes seven members: Adam, Seth, Enosh, Kenan, Mahalalel, Jared, and Enoch.
Jude refers to Enoch as the seventh member of the human family, and he cites the prophet Enoch to condemn treasonous behavior. The text is not considered canonical by any major religious body, but it was used by Jewish Christians in the first century.
Although it is possible that Jude did not know exactly how to translate the Greek text of the Book of Enoch, it still bears careful analysis. In verses 9 and 14, Jude quotes a passage from the Book of Enoch.
While it may seem that Jude is citing a pagan book, it was a work of total deception. Jude could not have quoted a work that contained so much false teaching and mythical nonsense.
This quotation from the Book of Enoch was taken from the prophet Enoch, who lived before the flood. Genesis 5:24 credits Enoch with walking with God. Despite his age, he was removed from earth without dying.
In verses 14 and 15, Jude quotes Enoch’s prediction: that the Lord will return with the holy ones. This is one of the few passages in the Bible where Jude corrects an apocryphal passage.
Judaism’s relationship with apocryphal book
The apocryphal book of Enoch has long been of interest to Jews. Its story of the fall of a patriarch, Enoch, evokes a parallel with the story of Noah’s Ark. Both stories include the presence of a fallen angel.
In both tales, the angel’s opposition is provoked by the patriarch’s human origin and the breach of angelic boundaries. The angel then chills Enoch’s “face” so much that no human would look at him without being chilled.
Jude explicitly associates Sodom and Gomorrah with 1 Enoch, while the canonical Genesis story does not. Sodom’s sin is usually described as one of injustice and inhospitality.
The book of Jubilees, on the other hand, emphasizes its sexual immorality. Jude, too, uses the apocryphal book of Enoch to make a point.
The apocryphal book of Enoch is the oldest Jewish work that is not in the Bible. It was written in the third century BCE, shortly after the Babylonian Exile and the establishment of the Second Jewish Commonwealth.
It also predates the Maccabean revolt in 172 BCE. The oldest copies of this work were discovered among the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The apocryphal Book of Enoch has a controversial history. While Jude may have quoted from the apocryphal book of Enoch, it does not alter the inspiration of Scripture.
Its inclusion in the Bible does not mean that the Early Church removed it because of its internal inconsistencies. It is, however, a work of art, and its author was a highly influential Christian writer.
Contradictions in the book
There are many Contradictions in the Book of Enoch. First, Enoch did not die! This is a contradiction in itself. Second, no one would make this claim if Enoch died! And third, the Book of Enoch is not written by Enoch himself.
In fact, it is a collection of several books by many different authors, labeled Pseudepigrapha by scholars. Considering these contradictions, the Book of Enoch has serious red flags as to its credibility.
In addition, it is unlikely that the Book of Enoch was written by Enoch himself. Scholars generally agree that it was written much later than Enoch’s lifetime, during the intertestamental period between the book of Malachi and the events of the New Testament.
Scholars also agree that the Book of Enoch was a work attributed to unknown authors, in order to lend it credibility. Therefore, many scholars have argued that the Book of Enoch is a work of fiction and not a historical record.
Second, the Book of Enoch teaches a dangerous error. While it teaches that Hell dwellers will be punished, it also teaches that God will choose the righteous from Hell. This dangerous heresy robs Noah and his message of faith and salvation.
Therefore, this book of Enoch is a dangerous heresy. As such, it is vital to study it and make sense of the text.
Third, the Book of Jude quotes Enoch, and then cites it in another part of the Bible. In this case, Jude cites Enoch four thousand years later. Because Enoch is not an inspired book, the Book of Enoch is considered a false writing.
The Bible also refers to Enoch in a different context than Genesis. Its writings were translated by Moses, and he is a reputed recorder, which allows him to write what others had said hundreds of years ago.
Is it inspired?
Is the Book of Enoch inspired? Yes and no. It may be true in parts, but isn’t inspired as Scripture? The Early Church did not include the Book of Enoch as a part of the Bible. But what about Jude’s quote from Enoch?
Does it mean that the Lord inspired Enoch? Paul quotes epimenides in Titus 1:12, but we can’t conclude that it is inspired.
The Bible is not the only source for this passage. It’s often cited by supporters and opponents alike. For example, Jude says that Enoch prophesied about the seven men who would follow Adam.
And the Book of Enoch records that prophesied about these men and their descendants. It’s not a literal reproduction of Enoch, but a reference to it.
If you have read Jude’s book, you’ll find that Jude cites the Book of Enoch in the Bible, but his citation is a reference to Enoch, and not a literal translation of the passage.
The Book of Enoch contains internal contradictions. For example, Enoch 6:7-8 lists fallen angel leaders. Rameel is one of them, but so is Azazel. Similarly, Aretstikapha is another. All of these names suggest that these angels are fallen angels.
But there are several other fallen angels, including Ariel, Samsapeel, and Jael.
Is the Book of Enoch inspired? is a tough question. Supporters must decide whether the Ethiopian copy is bad or not, and whether Jude’s quotation is inspired. Jude’s letter is authoritative, but it doesn’t say whether Enoch actually wrote the words.
It’s possible that Jude was simply quoting Enoch and putting it in his writing. Whatever the case, Is the Book of Enoch inspired?
Is it a dangerous myth?
Some people have come to believe that the Book of Enoch was written by a man named Enoch before the flood, but it’s not clear how true this is. While scholars have found one copy of the book in Ethiopia, it’s not known whether it was written before or after the biblical flood.
Furthermore, the Book of Enoch has several contradictions that make it incomparable to the Bible.
While the Enoch’s Book explains the fall of the seventh patriarch in Genesis, it also describes a subset of angels, the Nephilim, who interbred with humans and were the primary culprits of the violent destruction of the earth.
There’s another problem with this: it’s not a true story! The Book of Enoch is filled with a large amount of apocrypha. It’s not written by Enoch, and the myths surrounding it are based on ancient beliefs.
A major problem with the Book of Enoch is that it’s impossible for people living in a pre-flood era to have known about Mount Sinai, Mount Hermon, the Erythraean Sea, or the Parthians and Medes.
As a result, advocates of the Book of Enoch can’t explain how people could have known about these places after the flood, or how the book was written. The book does have some credibility, but its claims about angels standing on Mount Herman during the flood are simply untrue.
Some people believe that the Book of Enoch is apocalyptic book. This view is incompatible with the Bible, as the Book is not conceptually coherent. This is why the Book of Enoch is banned in the Catholic Church.
Many later Church Fathers have condemned it as a dangerous myth. However, it contains many interesting insights about the origin of evil and the nature of the enemy.